Tag Archives: equipment

Light

The key ingredient to all photography is light — interesting, variable, colorful and dramatic light, wherever you can find it.

I’ve been playing a lot this week with simple and not-so-simple flash setups and realizing, once again, what a waste of money high-tech and high-cost TTL flashes are. Everything you can do with that $350 X-TTL dedicated flash can be done with a $75 Vivitar 285HV. And, for what you pay for that single dedicated flash, you can own an entire functioning portrait studio’s worth of useful lighting equipment.

For details, read Strobist.

And, no, this is not a flash photo.

photo: Rick Bartow, 2008

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged 2 Comments

Back to photography?

The cat

OK, OK, I’ve been spending way too much time on equipment issues.  Camera gear is fun but has little or nothing to do with actual picture taking.  So I was determined today to get out and take some real photographs, but somehow having a job got in the way.

So I strapped one of my Canon 550 EX flashes onto the K20D this evening to try it in manual mode.  After fooling around some with the exposure, here’s a portrait of the cat.

Whew.  Mission, as the president said, accomplished.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged Leave a comment

K20D first impressions

My new (used) Pentax camera arrived from KEH Tuesday, right on schedule, along with a 16-50/2.8 zoom.  They’re beautiful together!  The camera body is small, heavy and solid.  It fits well in the hand, has a nice big screen on the back and looks like it could take lots of abuse.  The lens, likewise, feels very well built.

I haven’t had too much chance to use the camera yet, this being a work week, but playing around with it inside the house at night has made me feel certain I’ll keep it, unlike the 5D—which, to my great surprise, felt bulky, uncomfortable and slow to the point that I sent it back.

Coming back from the world of Canon, I found the Pentax user interface strange and uncomfortable at first.  The control dials are no longer right where my finger and thumb expect them to be.  More perplexing, the entire philosophy of operating the camera is different.  You use a Canon most easily by putting it in program mode, then adjusting exposure with either a program shift or exposure compensation, or both, using those two dials.  Exposure compensation on the Pentax, with default settings, requires holding down a button with your thumb while spinning the front control dial with your index finger.  That would take some getting used to, except that the Pentax can be programmed to work like the Canon. (Is the reverse true? I don’t think so.)

In fact, the Pentax offers a veritable blizzard of custom control possibilities.  You can change the two control dials to do just about anything you want if you go deep enough into the camera’s menus.  You can shift along the program line, you can do exposure compensation, you can set aperture or you can set shutter speed on either dial.  That’s the good news and the bad news—so many choices makes it difficult to decide which direction to take.  For now, I’ve programmed the dials to work like the Canon’s so I don’t get too confused.

The great Pentax innovation, which I am surprised no one has ever copied, is the green button.  In manual mode, press the green button and the exposure is instantly set to the program line, saving lots of fumbling with the dials. Another nice touch is a RAW button, which allows a one-touch shift to RAW capture.

I’m sure this all sounds—and seems—much more complicated than it actually is.  Once I get out tomorrow (it’s a holiday!) and take some pictures it will all become perfectly clear.

One thing that is totally clear already is how much better the image quality is on the K20D, playing around in the living room last night, than on my Canon 20d—at ISO 3200!  It didn’t even require pixel peeping to see that the Pentax image was much sharper, clearer, and more accurate in color than the Canon shot.

A problem though: my current version of Breeze Browser Pro converts Pentax PEF (RAW) files, but not very well, and I didn’t get the Pentax software with the camera.  I’ll have to see if I can get my hands on a copy.

My first impression of shooting with old M-series Pentax lenses, which don’t play well with the new electronic bodies, is that it’s still probably worthwhile to use them.  They work fine in manual mode, though they require stop-down metering.  I like the bokeh of the old 50/1.4 shot wide open; it will make a great portrait lens.

More as I figure it out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , Leave a comment

Equipment matters: Canon’s older 5D vs. Pentax K20D

We all know equipment doesn’t matter in photography.  Ansel Adams could’ve shot the Sierra with an Instamatic.  Annie Leibovitz would be just as much a vacuous celebrity photog if she shot with a Brownie.

But every now and then I fall prey to the lust for camera gear.

And with the economy in ruins around us, camera prices are falling as fast as the stock market.

So it was, with great anticipation, that I sent off for a used Canon 5D—the old one—a couple weeks ago.  It arrived at the office, I popped in a battery and a four-gig card and attached my old EOS 35/2.0 lens, and headed out to the parking lot to try the whole thing out.

To my considerable surprise, I was immediately disappointed.  The camera felt bulky, slow and unpleasantly loud compared to my old 20D.  The viewfinder information was so dim as to be useless in bright sunshine.  After fussing miserably for about two days I returned the camera body for a refund and then sat and grumbled.

The 5D sounds perfect on paper.  I shoot a lot of pictures in bad light, I love wide angle photography, and I would be thrilled to have my Canon lenses revert to their original coverage with a full frame camera.

But in the end, I couldn’t love it.  Image quality was better than the 20D, but really not by much considering that most of my photography is handheld and on the fly.

So once I got my refund, I bought a brand new 50D.  Right?

Well…

That would probably have been the sensible thing to do.  But I’ve always loved Pentax cameras—I still own a Pentax LX, a beautiful camera—and have long been tempted (by the sweet feel of Pentax bodies and the quality of Pentax lenses) to check out a Pentax digital body like the newish K20D.  The K20D offers a nearly 15 MB APS-C sensor in a small, tough body with the best weather sealing in the prosumer market.  And according to reviewers like Mike Johnston at The Online Photographer, its image quality is exceedingly high.

So I pressed the button today and bought a used K20D along with the highly rated 16-50/2.8 Pentax zoom, which is also weather sealed.

Hey, I live in Oregon!  It’s been known to rain here.

I should be able to use the K20D with the handful of older, manual Pentax lenses that I kept to use with the LX—a 28/2.8, a 50/1.4, and a 135/3.5.  I’ve also got a couple of old consumer zooms, both autofocus.

Am I going to abandon Canon?  Very doubtful.  It’s an exceedingly competent system, if not inspiring.  But I’m looking forward to shooting with a Pentax once more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , Leave a comment